Loading analysis data
The school index remains available while detailed evidence loads.
School Profiles
| Compare | Program | Records | People | Cohort | Outcomes | School rank | Placement quality |
|---|
School Rankings
Ranking method and inclusion rules
Placement quality rankThe formal ranking is the equal-person mean percentile of matched TT destinations. No sample-size or coverage adjustment changes the order.
Reliability diagnosticsCoverage, sample size, adjusted quality, and TT attainment are shown separately and do not enter the formal placement-quality rank.
Formal eligibilityRequires dense, near-continuous annual person-level disclosure; selective lists are excluded.
Unmatched outcomesRemain visible as evidence but are never assigned a low destination rank.
Economics sourceIDEAS/RePEc is primary. Tilburg is an optional robustness comparison with aggregate entities removed when ranked member schools are also present.
| Rank | School | School rank | Matched-TT avg destination | Median | Placement quality score | Matched TT sample | Source match coverage |
|---|
School Peers
Peer similarity method
MeaningSimilarity describes named-person outcome profiles; it is not a school-quality or placement-quality rank.
Comparable scopeEconomics and Business are separate. Business uses one selected field, with Operations and Information Systems kept distinct.
Profile featuresCosine similarity over destination, sector, field, country, and region frequencies.
Search behaviorSearch filters peer results after scoring and never changes the people used to estimate a pair's similarity.
EvidenceNamed-person sample and person-level source coverage are shown separately from similarity.
| Peer | Score | People | Shared Dest. | Shared Fields | Sector Fit | Quality context | Evidence |
|---|
People
| Person | School | Year | Field | Placement | Destination rank | Sector | Conf. |
|---|
School Cohorts
| People | School | Year | Academic | Industry | Non-home | Destinations |
|---|
Analysis
Placement Lanes
| Lane | People | Programs | Destinations | Years |
|---|
Placement Flows
1
Source programs
2
Destinations
Placement Atlas
Placement Pathways
| People | Program | Sector | Country | Destination | Years |
|---|
Field Explorer
| People | Field | Discipline | Academic | Industry | Programs | Destinations |
|---|
Placement Trends
| Trend | People | Share | Peak | Recent | Growth |
|---|
Analysis
Question-led entry points backed by the current person-level dataGap Finder
Coverage, person-level, and normalization work queue| Priority | Gap | Target | Discipline | Region | Rows |
|---|
Placement Geography
| Geography | People | Programs | Destinations | Non-home | Years |
|---|
Destination Rankings
Destination intake ranking method
Ranking unitThe hiring destination institution, not the graduating PhD program.
Feeder qualityEqual-person mean research-rank percentile of the PhD schools supplying TT hires.
Eligible hiresAcademic TT outcomes at the person-equivalent level: named people plus anonymous rows from complete annual placement tables.
Unmatched schoolsExcluded from the mean and reported through source-rank coverage, never assigned a low rank.
Comparable fieldEconomics and Business are ranked separately; Business follows the selected UTD field.
| Destination | Sector | Country | Programs | Rows | Years |
|---|
School Compare
Select schools from School Profiles, or use the quick add list here.Metric comparison
Coverage Tracker
Targets that will populate the site as source discovery and parsing expand| Target | Discipline | Region | Status | Priority | Rows |
|---|
Quality Flags
Rows requiring evidence review before interpretation| Program | Flag | Destination | Confidence |
|---|
Institution Review
Canonical destination labels to normalize next| Destination | Sector | Rows | Programs |
|---|